Your graphics card choice in 2025 will determine how good your gaming experience feels. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT sits at the top of our list for good reason. It pushes out 110 to 120 fps at 1440p and handles 4K gaming at a respectable 65 to 75 fps. Today’s GPU market has some seriously powerful options no matter what your budget looks like.
These performance gaps really matter when you’re deciding where to spend your money. Check out our graphics card comparison to see what fits your needs. Once you’ve settled on the right GPU, consider pairing it with GravaStar’s gaming peripherals. They’re designed to match the performance level of high-end hardware and give you an in-game and real-life boost.
Best Overall
1. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT left us impressed. Running 1440p with ultra settings saw frame rates hitting 110 to 120 fps in current AAA games like Black Myth: Wukong and Indiana Jones. Cranking everything up to 4K with maxed out details still kept performance solid at 65 to 75 fps.
The card uses AMD’s newest RDNA 4 architecture with 3,840 stream processors and 64 ray accelerators. Ray tracing tests showed about 45% better performance compared to the previous RX 7800 XT, which is a decent jump forward.
You get 16GB of GDDR6 memory running at 20 Gbps over a 256-bit bus, which works out to 640 GB/s of bandwidth. This setup handles heavy workloads without choking, including 8K texture streaming and complex video editing tasks.
Esports players will love the consistent 240+ fps in competitive games like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 at 1440p. Battle royale titles like Fortnite stayed above 165 fps even with epic visual settings turned on.
Content creators benefit from hardware-accelerated AV1 encoding, dual stream processing and solid compute performance. Apps like Blender Cycles and Adobe After Effects showed noticeable speed improvements over older hardware.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ Gaming at 1440p feels smooth, and 4K performance is better than expected. |
❌ Ray tracing still lags behind what you get with NVIDIA’s RTX lineup. |
|
✅ 16GB of VRAM means you won’t hit memory limits anytime soon, great for high-res textures. |
❌ FSR 4 game support is pretty sparse at the moment. |
|
✅ AI features are surprisingly useful for content creation and upscaling workflows. |
❌ Power consumption runs higher than the RTX 5070, something to consider for your electricity bill. |
|
✅ AV1 encoding works well for streaming without huge file sizes. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
3,840 cores |
|
Video Memory |
16GB GDDR6 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
640 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,180 / 2,514 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
64 units |
|
Total Board Power |
304W |
|
Power Connectors |
2x 8-pin |
Best for Ray Tracing, AI, and Creative Work
2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 5070 Ti really shines when ray tracing is part of the equation. In tests with ray tracing cranked up, we consistently see 90 to 110 fps at 1440p in demanding games like Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition and Control. Even pushing 4K with maximum ray tracing settings, the card kept things playable at 55 to 65 fps.
NVIDIA built this around their Blackwell architecture, packing in 8,960 CUDA cores plus 84 third-generation RT cores. Ray tracing performance vs the RTX 4070 Ti showed about 35% better results.
The memory setup uses 16GB of GDDR7 running at 28 Gbps through a 256-bit interface, which gives you 896 GB/s of bandwidth. This really helped with AI accelerated workflows and kept high-resolution texture streaming smooth without any hitches.
Content creators have a lot to work with here. Dual AV1 encoders mean you can stream and record 4K content at the same time without your gaming performance taking a hit. In complex Blender Cycles renders, completion times drop by about 40% compared to older cards.
Video editing feels smooth too. Adobe Premiere Pro timeline scrubbing stayed responsive even with multiple 4K layers and heavy effects processing.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ Ray tracing performance is genuinely solid with 84 RT cores. |
❌ Price tag is definitely steeper compared to what AMD is offering right now. |
|
✅ DLSS 4’s multi-frame generation makes a real difference in frame rates, more noticeable than expected. |
❌ 300W power draw means you’ll need a decent PSU, so budget for that if you’re upgrading. |
|
✅ Dual AV1 encoders are perfect if you’re serious about streaming or content creation. |
❌ That single 16-pin connector might force you to use an adapter depending on your current setup. |
|
✅ 16GB of GDDR7 memory keeps up with heavy creative work without choking. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
8,960 cores |
|
Video Memory |
16GB GDDR7 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
896 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,300 / 2,670 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
84 units |
|
Total Board Power |
300W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 16-pin |
Best for Enthusiasts Wanting More Than 5070 Ti
3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
For flagship 4K gaming, NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 5080 picks up where the RTX 5070 Ti stops. We hit 70 to 85 fps at 4K ultra in demanding games like Alan Wake 2 and Starfield. At 1440p with everything maxed, you’re looking at a consistent 120 to 140 fps.
The card packs 10,752 CUDA cores on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture, about 15% better performance than the RTX 4080 Super in our tests. You get 84 fourth-gen RT cores plus DLSS 4 multi frame generation support.
Memory specs include 16GB of GDDR7 at 30 Gbps across a 256-bit bus, hitting 960 GB/s of bandwidth. This handled 4K texture streaming smoothly during our testing.
Content creators benefit from upgraded media engines: 9th gen NVENC and 6th gen NVDEC. We could handle multiple 4K video streams while keeping real time preview performance smooth in editing software.
Competitive gamers still get solid performance with 200+ fps at 1440p in esports titles. The compute power also sped up our AI workloads and 3D rendering considerably compared to older hardware.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ 4K gaming performance is legit, handling most AAA titles without breaking a sweat. |
❌ 360W power draw is pretty hefty, your electricity bill might feel it. |
|
✅ 16GB of GDDR7 keeps texture loading smooth even with everything cranked up. |
❌ You’ll definitely need good case airflow and cooling to keep temps reasonable. |
|
✅ DLSS 4’s multi-frame generation actually delivers noticeable frame rate improvements. |
❌ That 16-pin connector means you need a modern PSU or you’re stuck with adapters. |
|
✅ Media engines are solid for video editing and content creation tasks. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
10,752 cores |
|
Video Memory |
16GB GDDR7 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
960 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,295 / 2,610 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
84 units |
|
Total Board Power |
360W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 16-pin |
Best for No-Compromise Enthusiasts
4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers the absolute best performance for extreme 4K and 8K gaming if budget isn’t a concern. This card holds 90 to 110 fps at 4K ultra in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 with full ray tracing, while hitting playable 30 to 45 fps at 8K in supported games. With 21,760 stream processors, it’s roughly 70% more powerful than the RTX 4090.
Built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture, you get 170 fourth-gen RT cores plus a massive 32GB of GDDR7 memory at 28 Gbps across a 512-bit bus. This setup provides 1,792 GB/s of memory bandwidth, perfect for professional tasks like 8K video editing, complex 3D rendering and AI model training.
Content creators working with huge datasets will find this GPU handles multiple 8K video streams without breaking a sweat. Gaming enthusiasts with high refresh 4K monitors get 120+ fps in esports titles at max settings, while the compute power accelerates professional workflows faster than any previous consumer card.
Just know you’ll need serious cooling and a robust PSU to support this beast’s performance demands.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ 4K gaming is buttery smooth, and it actually makes 8K gaming viable. |
❌ 575W power consumption is far above any other. |
|
✅ 32GB of GDDR7 memory means it can easily handle massive textures, complex scenes, heavy workloads. |
❌ You’ll need a high-end PSU and serious cooling setup, so budget for both. |
|
✅ Professional workstation performance rivals dedicated cards, great for serious creators. |
❌ Physical size is bigger than you expect, so measure your case twice before buying. |
|
✅ Ray tracing with 170 RT cores delivers the best RT experience you can get right now. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
21,760 cores |
|
Video Memory |
32GB GDDR7 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
1,792 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,015 / 2,407 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
170 units |
|
Total Board Power |
575W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 16-pin |
Best Last-Gen AMD Flagship
5. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is still a solid 4K gaming choice from AMD’s previous generation, a good alternative if you want to avoid NVIDIA cards.
This card hits 70 to 100 fps at 4K ultra in modern AAA titles like Hogwarts Legacy and Forza Horizon 5, while keeping 100 to 120 fps at 1440p with high settings. You get 6,144 stream processors with competitive rasterization performance against newer GPUs.
Built on AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture, it’s packing 96 ray accelerators plus 24GB of GDDR6 memory at 20 Gbps across a 384-bit bus. That works out to 960 GB/s bandwidth, which handles content creation tasks and multi application workflows well. The generous VRAM gives you headroom for future games that demand more memory.
Content creators get solid video encoding capabilities and OpenCL acceleration for apps like DaVinci Resolve and Blender. The card handles multiple 4K video streams smoothly while offering strong compute performance for 3D rendering, making it versatile for both gaming and productivity work.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ 4K rasterization performance is solid, handles most games at high settings without issues. |
❌ Ray tracing still can’t match what NVIDIA’s RTX lineup delivers. |
|
✅ 24GB of VRAM is honestly overkill for gaming right now, but should age well as texture sizes grow. |
❌ Power draw is higher than what you’d expect from newer generation cards. |
|
✅ Video encoding and decoding work great for content creators. |
❌ FSR upscaling works but doesn’t look as clean as DLSS in most games. |
|
✅ Multi-tasking performance is impressive, you can game while streaming and editing without major hiccups. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
6,144 |
|
Video Memory |
24GB GDDR6 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
960 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
1,855 / 2,500 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
96 |
|
Total Board Power |
355W |
|
Power Connectors |
2x 8-pin |
Best Mainstream NVIDIA
6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 provides solid 1440p performance for mainstream users seeking next-gen features without flagship pricing. This new GPU maintains 80 to 95 fps at 1440p ultra settings in demanding titles like Alan Wake 2 and Black Myth: Wukong, while achieving 120+ fps in popular PC gaming titles at high settings.
When you compare GPU options in this price segment, the RTX 5070 stands out for its balanced specifications and feature set. Built with NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture, this video card includes 6,144 CUDA cores and 50 ray tracing cores, giving you solid ray traced capabilities.
The unit features 12GB of GDDR7 memory running at 28 Gbps across a 192-bit bus, delivering 672 GB/s memory bandwidth for smooth texture streaming. Benchmark GPU testing shows this model performs approximately 20% better than the RTX 4070 while maintaining similar power efficiency.
Latest graphics cards like the RTX 5070 excel at delivering quality visuals for 1440p displays, making it an ideal choice for gamers upgrading from older hardware. The unit supports DLSS 4 multi frame generation technology, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles, making it competitive in GPU comparison tests for 2025.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ 1440p gaming performance is solid across most AAA titles, hits that sweet spot for high refresh gaming. |
❌ 12GB of VRAM might become a bottleneck for 4K gaming as games get more demanding. |
|
✅ DLSS 4 makes a real difference in frame rates when you need the extra performance boost. |
❌ Ray tracing performance is decent but nothing special compared to the pricier models. |
|
✅ 220W power draw is reasonable compared to higher-end cards, won’t murder your electricity bill. |
❌ You’ll still need a modern PSU with the right connectors - older systems might need upgrades. |
|
✅ Price point feels fair for mainstream gaming builds without breaking the bank. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
6,144 |
|
Video Memory |
12GB GDDR7 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
672 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,160 / 2,485 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
50 |
|
Total Board Power |
220W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 16-pin |
Best Value AMD
7. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers strong 1440p performance for users seeking a budget graphics card with generous memory allocation. Built on AMD’s RDNA 4 architecture, this graphics card delivers 70 to 90 fps at 1440p high settings in modern AAA titles like Starfield and Forza Horizon 5, while maintaining smooth performance at even higher frame rates in competitive games.
In the GPU hierarchy, this model positions itself as a compelling mid-range option with standout memory specifications.
Featuring 2,048 stream processors and 32 ray accelerators, this unit provides solid rasterization performance for a graphics card in its price segment. The standout feature remains its 16GB GDDR6 memory configuration running at 18 Gbps across a 128-bit bus, delivering 288 GB/s bandwidth.
This substantial memory allocation sets it apart from competing NVIDIA GPUs that typically offer 8GB to 12GB at similar price points, making it more future-proof for upcoming titles with higher VRAM requirements.
Content creators and streamers will appreciate this graphics card’s performance in video editing workflows, where the generous memory buffer allows for smooth timeline scrubbing with multiple 4K layers.
While it may not match the raw compute power of higher-tier graphics cards, its balanced approach makes it suitable for users who prioritize the best graphics quality at 1440p resolution without stretching their budget.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ 16GB of VRAM is generous for the price point and should handle future games without memory issues. |
❌ Power efficiency isn’t quite as good as what NVIDIA’s newer architectures deliver. |
|
✅ 1440p rasterization performance is really solid and runs most games smoothly at high settings. |
❌ FSR upscaling works but still doesn’t match DLSS’s visual quality in most games. |
|
✅ Most models run surprisingly quiet and cool thanks to good thermal designs across the board. |
❌ 128-bit memory bus creates bandwidth bottlenecks compared to higher-tier cards. |
|
✅ Price-to-memory ratio is competitive - you get a lot of VRAM for what you pay . |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
2,048 |
|
Video Memory |
16GB GDDR6 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
288 GB/s (128-bit) |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
1,900 / 3,200–3,330 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
32 |
|
Total Board Power |
160 to 180W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 8-pin |
Best Budget Pick
8. Intel Arc B570
The Intel Arc B570 is the most affordable option for gamers seeking a graphics card that’s capable of solid 1440p performance while maintaining 10GB VRAM capacity.
This budget focused unit delivers 50 to 65 fps at 1440p medium settings in popular titles like Hogwarts Legacy and Call of Duty, making it competitive with other entry level options when considering graphics card performance per dollar spent.
Unlike many budget graphics card alternatives, the B570 includes modern features like AV1 encoding and XeSS upscaling technology.
For users building their first PC gaming setup or upgrading from integrated graphics, this represents solid value in today’s market. While it may not deliver the best graphics quality of premium options, it handles esports titles exceptionally well and provides a pathway into modern features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing.
Boost clocks can reach up to 2,750 MHz on some models, and the card supports 18 ray tracing units for entry level ray tracing effects. The CPU requirements remain modest, making it suitable for budget builds that pair well with a mid range processor.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ Pricing is budget-friendly while still offering 10GB of VRAM, decent value for the memory. |
❌ Driver optimization for newer games can be hit-or-miss, sometimes takes a while to get fixes. |
|
✅ 1080p gaming performance covers most titles without major issues. |
❌ Ray tracing performance is pretty weak and not really worth enabling in most cases. |
|
✅ AV1 encoding works well if you’re into streaming or content creation. |
❌ Power efficiency isn’t great compared to what newer GPU architectures achieve. |
|
✅ XeSS upscaling is available and gradually improving with updates. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Xe Cores |
18 (2,304 shading units) |
|
Video Memory |
10GB GDDR6 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
380 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,500 / up to 2,750 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
18 |
|
Total Board Power |
150W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 8-pin |
Best Entry-Level NVIDIA
9. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is an ideal entry point for users seeking graphics cards for gaming at 1080p and light 1440p resolutions. This gaming graphics card delivers 80 to 100 fps at 1080p ultra settings in demanding titles like Alan Wake 2 and Cyberpunk 2077, while maintaining 55 to 70 fps at 1440p medium settings.
Among entry-level options, NVIDIA’s card brings next-gen features like DLSS 4 multi-frame generation to budget conscious builders who want modern capabilities.
Featuring 4,352 CUDA cores and 34 ray tracing cores, this NVIDIA GPU provides decent ray traced performance for its price segment. The unit includes 16GB of GDDR7 memory running at 28 Gbps across a 128-bit bus, delivering 448 GB/s bandwidth that handles current games comfortably.
The base clock is 2,407 MHz, with boost clocks typically reaching 2,572 to 2,662 MHz, depending on the model. The generous memory allocation distinguishes this model from previous generation alternatives, providing headroom for future titles that demand higher VRAM usage.
Entry level builders will find that graphics cards offer varying levels of feature support, but the RTX 5060 Ti includes comprehensive driver optimization and day-one game support that established manufacturers provide.
The DLSS 4 implementation can boost performance significantly in supported titles, making 1440p gaming more accessible for users with modest budgets who still want quality visual experiences.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ 1080p gaming performance is solid with nice next-gen features included. |
❌ 4K gaming is pretty limited so you’ll be dropping settings or relying heavily on upscaling |
|
✅ 16GB of VRAM is generous for this price range - should handle future games without memory constraints. |
❌ Memory bus is narrow enough to create bandwidth bottlenecks in some scenarios. |
|
✅ DLSS 4 makes a noticeable difference in frame rates when you need the extra push. |
❌ Ray tracing works but performance is nothing to write home about at this tier. |
|
✅ Power efficiency at 115W is impressive and won’t stress your PSU or cooling setup. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
4,352 |
|
Video Memory |
16GB GDDR7 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
448 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
2,407 / 2,572–2,662 MHz |
|
Ray Accelerators |
34 |
|
Total Board Power |
115W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 8-pin |
Best Entry-Level AMD
10. AMD Radeon RX 9050
The AMD Radeon RX 9050 delivers efficient 1080p performance for esports enthusiasts and budget conscious builders seeking reliable gaming GPU capabilities.
This entry level option maintains 90 to 120 fps in competitive titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p high settings, while achieving 60 to 75 fps in AAA games at medium settings.
Among AMD GPUs in this price segment, the RX 9050 offers solid driver support and consistent performance for users prioritizing value over premium features.
Built on AMD’s refined RDNA 4 architecture, this model features an estimated 1,024 stream processors and 16 ray accelerators, though these specifications are based on industry leaks and have not been officially confirmed by AMD as of July 2025.
The 8GB GDDR6 memory runs at 18 Gbps across a 128-bit bus, delivering 288 GB/s bandwidth that handles current 1080p gaming requirements effectively. While it may not match the graphics card power of premium options, its efficient design makes it suitable for compact builds and budget setups.
Entry level users seeking their first dedicated gaming GPU will appreciate the straightforward driver installation and reliable performance this model provides.
Unlike powerful graphics cards that demand robust cooling and high wattage power supplies, the RX 9050 operates efficiently while delivering smooth frame rates in popular esports titles and older AAA games that remain relevant in today’s gaming landscape.
Please note that some technical details, such as stream processor and ray accelerator counts, are subject to change pending AMD’s official product announcement.
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
✅ Esports performance at 1080p is fantastic,- easily hits high refresh rates in competitive games. |
❌ Demanding AAA titles will require some compromise on settings to maintain smooth performance. |
|
✅ Power consumption and heat output are minimal, perfect for smaller builds or budget systems. |
❌ Ray tracing is basically a checkbox feature so don’t expect much actual performance with it enabled. |
|
✅ Entry-level pricing makes dedicated graphics accessible without breaking the bank. |
❌ 8GB of VRAM might become problematic as newer games demand more memory. |
|
✅ AMD’s driver support has been reliable with steady optimization improvements. |
❌ |
Graphics Card Comparison Key Specs
|
Stream Processors |
1,024 (unconfirmed) |
|
Video Memory |
8GB GDDR6 |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
288 GB/s |
|
Base/Boost Clock |
1,900 / 2,200 MHz (estimated) |
|
Ray Accelerators |
~16 (unconfirmed) |
|
Total Board Power |
120W |
|
Power Connectors |
1x 6-pin |
Buyers Guide: Choosing the Right Graphics Card in 2025
Choosing a graphics card in 2025 gets easier when you know what you need. The latest GPU benchmarks hierarchy shows big improvements across all price ranges, making this a great time to upgrade your gaming setup. Aside from checking out graphics card comparisons, here’s what you need to think about.
Know Your Gaming Needs
Entry level graphics card options like the AMD Radeon RX 9050 work great for 1080p gaming, giving you smooth frame rates in games like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2. These cheaper cards pair well with basic CPU comparison builds and don’t need much power.
For 1440p gaming, modern graphics cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT handle most AAA games really well. When looking at NVIDIA and AMD graphics card comparisons at this price, remember that NVIDIA usually does ray tracing better while AMD gives you more bang for your buck.
High-end graphics cards are for 4K gaming and heavy video editing work. Cards like the RTX 5080 and RX 9070 XT give you the power needed for maxed out settings at really high resolutions.
Think About More Than Just Speed
Ray tracing and AI upscaling tech really matter in graphics card comparisons in 2025. NVIDIA’s RTX 50 series does ray tracing and DLSS 4 better, so they’re perfect if you want the best visual effects and smooth gameplay in supported games.
How much VRAM you get is becoming more important as games need more memory. Current graphics card rankings prefer cards with 16GB or more memory for 1440p and 4K gaming.
Check for Software and Ecosystem Support
NVIDIA cards come with mature drivers, meaning you get day-one game support and fewer crashes or compatibility issues. NVIDIA GPUs also offer a more robust feature set including DLSS for better performance, Reflex for lower input lag, and Broadcast for streaming improvements. These features work across hundreds of games and applications.
AMD provides reliable drivers and strong performance in modern APIs, but their FSR upscaling and ray tracing technologies are still catching up to NVIDIA’s ecosystem. AMD cards often cost less but may not have the same level of software polish or day-one game optimization that NVIDIA users expect.
Future-Proofing Tips
Aim for 16GB VRAM if you want your graphics card to last several years at 1440p or higher resolutions. Games are starting to use more memory for textures and effects, so having extra VRAM prevents stuttering and frame drops as games become more demanding.
Check power requirements and PSU compatibility before buying any new GPU. Modern graphics cards need specific power connectors and wattage ratings. Make sure your power supply can handle the card’s requirements plus leave some headroom for the rest of your system.
Consider your monitor’s resolution and refresh rate when doing a graphics card comparison. Don’t overspend on a GPU if your display can’t take advantage of it. A 4K monitor needs more graphics card power than a 1080p display, while high refresh rate monitors benefit from GPUs that can push higher frame rates consistently.
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.